Jair Jurrjens Optioned to AAA Gwinnett

Written by Flint on April 24, 2012 – 6:43 am

As reported by Atlanta Braves beat writer for the Atlanta Journal Constitution, Braves RHP Jair Jurrjens has been optioned to triple-A after last night’s loss to the Dodgers.  He’s 0-2 and hasn’t looked good at all this year or even during Spring Training.  Updates and reactions to come as the day goes on.


Tags: , ,
Posted in General, Pitching, Roster Moves | No Comments »

Reaction of the D-Backs Series, 3-1

Written by Flint on April 23, 2012 – 9:12 pm

Hello again faithful Braves Blast readers.

As we begin this week I think it’s important for us to take a look back at the past 4 games our Atlanta Braves have played.  The four game series, which I’ve never been a fan of a four game series – just seems one too long, against the Arizona Diamondbacks was one that Braves Country can be happy about.  Our boys went 3 – 1 against a pretty good team out west.  Yes, they were a little banged up – but a win is a win and it doesn’t matter who you face.

There was so much to cover that just blew my mind.  For starters, no pun intended, our starting rotation was amazing.  A big knock against the Braves at the start of the year was the lack of innings the starters were accruing.  The bullpen’s taxation from 2011 can be attributed to the lack of managerial savvy of Fredi and also the large number of games where starters didn’t go past 5 innings.  That simply causes a great bullpen to get tired and sputter come the end of August and all of September.  That concern was something Mike Minor, Brandon Beachy and Tommy Hanson decided alleviate.  Going 8, 7.3, and 7, respectively, the ‘pen wasn’t relied on too much.  This was exactly what our staff needed.  Young guys to step up and push each other.  Brandon Beachy said in the post game interview after his start in game two, that he wanted to go out and try to match what Mike Minor did.  I’m sure Tommy Hanson didn’t want to feel left out, so he went out, and after giving up a run in the first and second, managed to sit down 13 Diamondbacks in a row before Venters and Kimbrel struck out each of their sides.

It also helped that the bats continued the streak they’ve been on.  There isn’t much need to bring in your 7th, 8th and 9th inning men when you score an average of 9 runs a game during the 5-game winning streak the Braves were on.  Our second 5-game winning streak in 15 games for those of you keeping score.

Michael Bourn and Freddie Freeman have been on fire this past week.  They were, to simply put it, great.  Bourn was on base all the time it seemed.  His batting average for the last week was .464/.531/.536, 7 runs scored and 5 stolen bases.  That’s just creating havoc for opposing pitchers.   His OPS was 1.067.  For a guy with barely any power, that’s outrageous.

The more impressive part of our offense was our young first baseman, Freddie Freeman.  His slash line against the D-backs was .467/.500/.1.067.  The boy went on a tear out west.  He spoke about it in an interview after game two, that he really loves playing in front of his family and friends.  Freeman is a So Cal native and he had a strong contingent of Freeman faithful make the approx. 3-4 hour drive to see their native son put a wallop on the D-backs pitching staff.  He put a home run in the pool out in right center and went opposite field to push one into the left field seats.  An interesting note was that the damage done was all while Freddie occupied the 3-hole in the line up.  He did this even when Chipper was in the game for the 2nd and 3rd of the series.

As long as Freeman is contributing with his bat and continues to play great defense, I have no problem with him hitting in the usual spot reserved for the almost 40 year old Chipper Jones.

Starting tonight, our Braves take on the Los Angeles Dodgers.  Hopefully the Braves can continue their dominance at the plate and take advantage of the fact that the Dodgers two best starters, Clayton Kershaw and Chad Billingsley, will not be pitching against us.

As always dear reader, pray for pitching, be proud of the tomahawk chop and if you need a smile, just remember when Sid slid.

 

 


Tags: , , , , , ,
Posted in Game Analysis, General | No Comments »

Looking into the Crystal Ball: Predictions for the Rest of the Year

Written by Caleb on June 23, 2011 – 12:06 pm

The season is 46% completed, so it is well past time to start making predictions on the finishing order of the National League. The previous statement is completely sarcastic (still need to find that sarcasm font), however I do think a significant amount of the season has been played, enough so that we should, by now, have a clearer picture of how teams will continue to play and how the season should finish. Using the Pythagoren W-L formula from Baseball-Reference, I am going to predict how the final season standings will look. As a note, current Pythagorean W-L records are within 2 games of actual wins and losses through the games on June 21, except for the Giants who statistically “should” have four less wins and the Astros who “should” have three more wins. With the calculations this close to the actual records, I feel confident the formula will provide a reasonably accurate prediction. As with all predictions, mine will probably be wrong. If the Braves go on a tear and win the NL East, I will happily eat crow.

Let’s start with the NL West.

Wins Losses
ARI 85 77
COL 84 78
SFG 77 85
LAD 73 89
SDP 71 91

The results are not entirely surprising. Arizona has been playing the best baseball of those five teams recently. San Francisco’s loss of Buster Posey will dramatically affect their offensive output and, more than likely, their pitching output. Colorado seems to always hang around and be in contention towards the end of the year and the prediction parallels that statement. With just one run separating the two, it is a toss-up on which team wins the division.

Wins Losses
CIN 87 75
STL 85 77
MIL 84 78
PIT 77 85
CHC 66 96
HOU 65 97

The NL Central is the closest race with three teams separated by three games. It will be interesting to see how the Cardinals respond the next six to eight weeks without Albert Pujols. With Pujols having a sub-par year, I believe the Cardinals can stay within striking distance until he returns. This is especially true if Lance Berkman can continue to provide some power.

Cincinnati has played well, and if the Cardinals do struggle without Pujols, I can easily see this team stringing together a few series wins and pulling away from Cardinals and Brewers.

I do not see Milwaukee competing with those two for the rest of the year, but with an injury here or there to Cincinnati and Milwaukee finally healthy, there is a slight possibility for the Brewers to test the Reds to the end of the season.

Wins Losses
PHI 100 62
ATL 91 71
WSN 83 79
NYM 78 84
FLA 71 91

The NL East appears to be the easiest to predict. A majority of analysts predicted that the Phillies and the Braves would finish first and second. I’m surprised at how easily the Braves will win the wild card race. I was expecting it to come down to the wire (which I’m sure it will), even in the formula. A four-win lead is not something I am even willing to predict now.

The Phillies have played exceedingly well considering the injuries they have had to endure. I have no reason to doubt their ability to play at this high of a level throughout the rest of the season. Their offense should continue to play at a high-level and of course their pitching staff should still be un-hittable.

However, I am dubious of the Braves continuing as they are. The pitching will continue to be excellent, of that I have very little doubt. What about the offense though? Even as awful as the offense has been, the Braves are still predicted to win 91 games. Thank you pitching staff. What happens if Uggla starts hitting .250 and his home run total trends towards thirty for the year? Heyward is predicted to return to last year’s form at some point this year and Prado should be ready to contribute as soon as the infection is knocked out. What does this offense look like in a few weeks with a healthy lineup and an effective Uggla?  Is the team still on pace for 91 wins or is it on pace for 95?

The four playoff teams will consist of NL East winner Philadelphia, NL Central winner Cincinnati,  NL West winner Arizona, and the wild card winner, Atlanta. The Phillies will face off against the Diamondbacks with the Braves will face the Reds. The NLCS will have the Phillies and Braves squaring off. I am too biased to make and actual prediction on that game, so I’ll just leave it at that.

What do you think? Will the offense turn around? Will the Phillies continue to dominate? With nice games remaining with the Phillies, what do you think the Braves’ record will be against them for the remainder of the season?


Tags: , , , ,
Posted in General | No Comments »

Jonny Venters and the Cy Young Award

Written by Caleb on June 10, 2011 – 11:33 am

There has been enough talk about the negatives with the Braves to last a while, so let’s take a more positive approach; Jonny Venters and his chances to win the Cy Young award.

There have only been nine relievers to win the award and all nine have been considered closers, so Venters already has a disadvantage. Voters like numbers, and easily defined numbers at that. A save is an easier number for voters to recognize and associate with dominance, ignoring the various issues with it and the other statistics that could better highlight dominance..  With Venters not having the closer role, obviously his saves will be no where near the nine reliever winners. Will voters recognize that he is one hell of a pitcher without racking up saves? I think they might, but he’ll have to be outstanding in other statistics to compensate for the voters’ tendencies.  It is important to note Craig Kimbrel’s struggles of late. If Venters does receive more time closing in the future, this could further bolster his candidancy.

Let’s take a look at how he compares. The first line of the table is the average of each statistic for the nine previous winners. The second line is Venters’s statistics through June 8. The third line is an updated projection by ESPN.

 

IP

bWAR

G

W

L

SV

ERA

WHIP

SO/BB

Average

112

3.83

74

7

4

37

1.95

1.003

4.08

Jonny Venters

37.2

2.4

34

4

0

1

0.48

0.74

3.55

ESPN

97.2

89

10

0

3

0.48

0.74

 

*As usual, data is gleaned from Baseball-Reference and ESPN.

Obviously, the nine relievers who won the Cy Young award are damn good at their jobs. As mentioned previously, Venters cannot compete on saves. Unless he and Kimbrel split time in the closer role, he’ll have a fraction of the average. In comparison to the other averages, he seems to meet or exceed them. However, before going any further, we must recognize that there is a significant possibility that Venters does not continue on his torrid pace.
With almost 40% of the season completed, for the sake of brevity, let’s assume ESPN is spot-on with their projection (it won’t happen, but it’s nice to dream). With an ERA and WHIP so minuscule and a high number of innings pitched, I do not see how he could not be considered for the award. If his ERA is below 1.00 and especially below 0.50, he should be a definite front-runner for the award. One has to take into account his bWAR should be higher than average, the number of games he pitched in will be higher than average, and his record will be better than average by quite a margin. The only below average statistic besides number of saves is his SO/BB ratio, which is not significantly below. The issue then comes into play of his competition in 2011, not just the prior relievers.

For the majority of the years when the reliever won the Cy Young, there was not a dominate starting pitcher to compete against. This year could be similar, though I doubt it. To begin with, Venters has competition from two of his own, Jair Jurrjens and Tommy Hanson.  Jurrjens has been stellar since his return from the disabled list and Hanson continues to improve with each outing.  This is ignoring Josh Johnson, who had the lowest ERA (Jurrjens was second) before being placed on the disabled list and perennial contender Roy Halladay. Or any other starting pitcher that continues to pitch well, accumulate innings, and a low ERA.

In summary, Venters has to continue to operate at an extremely high level just to be considered for the award. To win it, there cannot be a dominant starting pitcher and/or his ERA must remain below 1.00 for voters to recognize the incredible season he will have.

As a side note, while doing research I looked at Dennis Eckersley’s career, specifically his 1992 Cy Young award season. I was seven during that season, so I’ve never spent any time looking at his statistics or his career. At seven, I was more interested in being a Ghostbuster one day (sadly, that is not what I’m doing right now).  What’s even more impressive is his 1990 campaign. His ERA was 0.61 in 73.1 innings with a .614 WHIP and 18.25 K/BB ratio. I wish I had been paying closer attention to baseball then. It would be interesting to hear from anyone who watched those seasons of dominance by Eckersley and compare it to the dominance of Venters’s season so far. I assume watching Eckersley is similar to what we are watching with Venters. Let’s just hope it ends for Venters as well as it did for Eckersley in 1992.


Tags: , ,
Posted in General | 2 Comments »

Martin Prado: A Look at First Pitches and Overall Offense

Written by Caleb on May 20, 2011 – 10:07 am

Is it true that Martin Prado never swings at the first pitch? Take a look at the two graphs from Texas Leaguers pitch f/x. The first is the location and type of pitch of the first pitches in the plate attempt when Prado swings. The second is location and type of pitches when Prado does not swing.

 

Obviously, he doesn’t swing at most of the first pitches in an at-bat.  Of the 17 he has swung at, only 7 have been in play. Of those 7, 6 have been outs. That’s not exactly a high percentage, so maybe it is best that Prado not swing at the first pitch. I know, it’s small sample size, but maybe the first pitch is a mental act for him.  Maybe it settles him into the pitch sequence by taking the first pitch.

Since Prado, for the majority of his plate appearances, is pretty much satisfied on having a 1-0 or 0-1 count, what happens with the next pitch if he is 0-1?  If he does swing, he is highly selective. Evidenced by the graphic below, Prado will rarely swing at anything outside of the strike zone.

.

How about 1-0? He is, more than likely, taking the pitch again with a take to swing ratio of approximately 2:1. And if he actually swings, he is even more selective.  Of the 28 or so pitches he swings at on a 1-0 count, only 7 are outside of the strike zone, and all 7 are within a foot or so of the strike zone.

Does it matter if he takes the first pitch, no matter if it is a strike? On 1-0 counts, Prado is batting .315 with a wOBA of .396 and on 0-1 counts Prado is batting .296 with a wOBA .321. Obviously he will be a better hitter with a 1-0 count, but the difference is not a great chasm.

With the first pitch already past Prado and into the mitt, let’s look at his overall offense this year. All rankings are NL only.  In addition, please note that Prado also leads the NL in games played, at bats, and plate appearances so he has had more opportunities than his competitors.

As of 5/19 he is tied for second with hits at 57, 2 behind Jose Reyes. He is tied for 10th with 11 doubles, but only 3 back of the lead (none other than Chipper Jones), tied for fourth in total bases with 86 only 8 behind Ryan Braun, and surprisingly enough for a lead-off hitter, he is tied for 7th with 28 RBIs, 7 behind Howard and Berkman.

Glaringly, he also leads the league in outs made at 153, nine more than Chris Young and ten more than Dan Uggla.  Why such a high number of outs? Mainly because of Prado’s second-place number of 10 GIDPs, three behind Albert Pujols (and the opporutnities provided by leading the NL in games played, at bats, and plate appearances).  Most lead-off hitters do not have the opportunity for a GIDP because the lower lineup hitters are usually not on base. With the Braves this year, the 7th and 8th-place hitters are doing well, hence Prado’s high RBI and GIDP situation because of the number of opportunities he as for either to occur. He is making contact 89.5% of the time overall when he swings, and if he swings at a pitch in the strike zone, the number increases to 96.1%.  This amounts to a lot of batted balls in play, increasing the likelihood for an RBI and conversely a GIDP.

What about his plate discipline overall? He is swinging at 39.8% of pitches thrown, which is about his career average, but he is swinging at 29.3% of the pitches outside of the strike zone and 51.3% inside the strike zones, significantly above and below his career averages. Though with a higher percentage of swings at pitches outside of the zone, his strikeout and walk rates are in line with his career numbers, so he must be making contact with these pitches. With higher contact, there’s a greater chance of grounding into the dreaded double play.

As the calendar turned to May, Prado has picked up his offensive numbers significantly. The table below lists a few of his impressive May stats compared to  March/April. I would be perfectly fine if his May numbers continue throughout the year.  Unlikely, but one can hope.

 

OPS BABIP wOBA
March/April 0.673 0.267 0.296
May 0.954 0.377 0.399


Tags: ,
Posted in General | No Comments »

A Closer Look at Defense

Written by Caleb on May 12, 2011 – 10:15 am

After Tuesday’s defensive fiasco, it’s an apt time to check out some of the advanced metrics for defense. The two most widely quoted calculations are John Dewan’s +/- system and Mitchel Llichtman’s Ultimate Zone Rating (UZR). 

Dewan’s +/- system is calculated by assigning runs saved (positive) or runs allowed (negative) in terms of the average MLB player, based on a variety of factors including arm strength (outfielders) to bunts saved (first and third basemen). An average player will have a total defensive runs saved (DRS) of 0.

UZR, in some circles, has become the more reliable defensive statistic. Similar to Dewan’s, UZR assigns a number of runs saved (positive) or runs allowed (negative) compared to the MLB average of 0.  UZR calculations, to be fully reliable, need a large sample size, but for this post, we’ll just look at the rating for 2011 so far and just know that it might not be indicative of future play. We’ll  just use the data to determine a relative opinion of the player in regards to above or below average defensive play through the first part of the season. Fangraphs has an excellent primer located here if you are interested in a more in-depth discussion of UZR.

Before Wednesday’s game, the Braves were ranked 29th in all of the MLB in UZR and 13th in DRS. Because of the small sample size, these two numbers will vary widely, as evidenced by the chart below.  Over the course of a larger sample, the two should be in relative proximity.

The following chart has the innings played, the DRS and UZR for each of the seven regular starts. Omitted are pitchers and catchers.

Name Pos Inn DRS UZR
Alex Gonzalez SS 310 6 1.9
Martin Prado LF 301 4 0.4
Jason Heyward RF 316 0 -1
Dan Uggla 2B 334 -1 -1.6
Chipper Jones 3B 294 -2 -2.4
Freddie Freeman 1B 298 -6 -4.7
Nate McLouth CF 317 -4 -7.9
*Data courtesy of Fangraphs

 

The chart should not come as a surprise. Alex Gonzalez has been the best-looking defender on the diamond. His range, throws (some thanks to Freddie Freeman on those) and double-play ability have bolstered his impressive defense this year. It seems like there is a play every game he should not make, but somehow does. It is worth noting that Martin Prado has played relatively well in his new position. One could assume with more experience in left, his defense should continue to improve.

And just as Gonzalez was not a surprise as the best defender, Nate McLouth is not a surprise as the worst defender (at least according to UZR). His range is suspect at times and his arm strength is nonexistent. I think everyone cringes when a ball is looped to center with an opponent taking off from second.  Freeman’s struggles are more reasonable than McLouth’s. Freeman is a rookie and will take some time to adjust. McLouth should have center field figured out.

Freeman, and first basemen in general, are underepresented in UZR (maybe DRS too?). Neither take into account the ability to “scoop” a ball thrown from another player. If you watch Freeman on nightly basis, his ability to turn awful throws into outs seems well above average.  Is it enough to compensate for the runs he costs the team elsewhere?

DRS and UZR do not tell the whole defensive picture, but they do provide a better calculation to compare players over a large sample size than other defensive statistics. For example, let’s take a look at fielding percentage. Imagine a shortstop that has poor range and one that has excellent range. The excellent ranger will reach a great number of balls, increasing the number of mistakes that could be committed. Is it fair to penalize an excellent ranger for committing an error on a ball that the poor ranger could not even attempt? In fielding percentage he is, with UZR and DRS he is not.

Defensive statistics have a ways to go to reach the reliability and inclusiveness of their offensive counterparts, but they have definitely progressed from just errors and fielding percentage. It will be interesting to look back at the end of the season and see if Gonzalez is still the best defender on the team and if Freeman has made any progress through his rookie campaign.


Tags: , , , ,
Posted in General | No Comments »

Despite Standings, Braves & Phillies’ Performance Nearly Identical

Written by Jonathan on May 6, 2011 – 6:00 pm

The Braves lead the NL in ERA (2.94). Not far behind are the Phillies with a 3.03 ERA.

The Braves have scored 4.2 runs per game thus far. The Phillies… 4.6 per game.

The Braves run differential is +38 (third-best in baseball).  The Phillies differential… +41 (second-best)

But the similarities don’t stop there. In his latest “Fried Baseball” audio blog, Kent Covington points out the similarities in the way these two teams have played vs quality teams, the way each team has beaten up on cellar dwellers… and the role schedule strength has played in the early season standings. Give us your thoughts in the comments section below.

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

Download the audio.


Tags: , , , , , ,
Posted in General | No Comments »

Is Dan Uggla a Slow Starter?

Written by Caleb on April 27, 2011 – 9:44 am

Quick Introduction: I love baseball and I love numbers. So why not put the two together? This post will be dipping into the water of statistics. I will warn you, I like advanced metrics. I hope that statement did not run you off. I promise to try to make this as exciting and as relateable as possible (I hope that’s possible). If there is anything you are interested in or have any questions, please let me know and I’ll fire up the old abacus.

Is Dan Uggla a slow starter? I have heard several times that he is, in fact, a slow starter. This statement seemed reasonable to me since Uggla did appear to be off to a rough start. I wondered if this was a trend or is 2011 an outlier, so I gathered some data.

The two charts below contain Uggla’s batting average, on-base percentage, and slugging numbers from 2006-2011. The first table contains the numbers for the first 23 games of each season. The second table contains his yearly numbers.

 

First 23 Games

Year Batting Average OBP Slugging
2011 .182 .234 .398
2010 .295 .364 .534
2009 .212 .313 .400
2008 .261 .324 .467
2007 .237 .309 .464
2006 .273 .333 .466

Annual
Year Batting Average OBP Slugging
2010 .287 .369 .508
2009 .243 .354 .459
2008 .260 .360 .514
2007 .245 .326 .479
2006 .282 .339 .480

Using this data, Uggla does not appear to start slow. During the first 23 games of the past five seasons, Uggla has averaged a slash line of .256/.329/.466. During the same five seasons his annual slash line is .263/.350/.488. Through the first 23 games, Uggla isn’t hitting drastically below the slash line he’ll end up with for the year. If Uggla is going to be called a slow starter, it would only be in comparison to others.

A more reasonable statement would be that Uggla is starting slower this year than he has in the past (according to his slash line).  But if we continue to trust the projections for his season, he will be raising his average to the .250-.260 range. Bill James, Marcel and ZiPS projections have his batting average at .256, .260 and .259 respectively. If we assume these projections are still reliable, Uggla would definitely be a candidate for slow starting, but this would be the outlier, not the norm.

Perhaps starting slow means that Uggla’s power does not start early in the season? Well that wouldn’t be entirely true at first glance either. Through the first 23 games (14% of the regular season) Uggla has averaged 4.2 home runs and over the course of those five seasons he has averaged 31 home runs. You might have guessed this by now, and you are right. 4.2 home runs are 14% of his yearly average, so it seems like Uggla isn’t starting slowly in the home run department. Just as an FYI, he has 5 home runs this year through 23 games. I do have to admit that his slugging and OBP does appear to start off a significant amount lower than his finishing point.

I know there are a lot of issues with this cursory analysis. What should be considered the “start” of the season? Are the sample sizes sufficient? Maybe over the first 50 games his slash line is much lower than his ending slash line?  What about advanced metrics?

I understand that there are those  shortfalls and the countless others I have not even considered yet. I thought this would be a quick way to start a discussion and to see if there is any data to reinforce the idea of Dan Uggla starting slowly.


Tags: , , ,
Posted in General | 2 Comments »

Chipper Out For Season

Written by Colin on August 12, 2010 – 11:43 am

In 1995 a rookie third baseman with an infectious grin and a hot bat helped the Braves win the World Series. Since then, Chipper has slowed up a bit but still loves the game, still kills the Mets every time he can, and is the lifeblood of the Atlanta Braves. Tuesday night we saw a brilliant defensive play at third base – and sadly that might be the last play we see from Chipper.

Various sources are reporting that Chipper is out for the season with a torn ACL. He was already thinking about retiring after this season, and he could very well decide not to come back. Who knows? I know I don’t, but I find myself reflecting on his career and realizing how rare of a player Chipper was.

How many other sluggers of his caliber have stayed in one city their entire life? How many stars have restructured their contracts to provide more flexibility to their team? How many great third basemen have moved to left field so the team could add offense where it was most easily found? How many stars have thought about retiring when their career starts to decline instead of denying it and trying to eek it out for a few more years?

Yes, he was a bit of an arrogant ass when he was younger. But that’s tempered with age and experience now, and his love for the game remains.

Chipper is a rare player – not just because he’s perhaps the best switch hitter that’s ever played or hits homers against the Mets even when he’s slumping against everyone else, but because he bent over backwards for a team that he made his. Chipper’s poured his heart out for us Atlanta Braves fans, and that’s something I’ll never forget.

Now get the surgery out of the way and go rehab that knee, Chipper. Hopefully we haven’t seen the last of Mr. Larry Wayne Jones, Jr.


Tags: , ,
Posted in Injuries | 6 Comments »

Time To Land A Center Fielder

Written by Colin on July 25, 2010 – 6:56 pm

If you watched the Atlanta Braves play the Florida Marlins this weekend, you saw Nate McLouth have several big at-bats when put in context of his future with the Braves. The latest – with the bases loaded in the top of the 11th – ended with a double play.

Yes, it was a hard-hit ball. Is he coming around? Maybe.

To me, it’s time to land another center fielder. While McLouth might come around and we may have moderate production out of the position the rest of the season, and I’m not OK with that.

The way this team is playing, I want to see us go out and get a player who can put some pop in the lineup. I want someone who is going to put us from playing pretty well in the NL East to the class of the NL East. I want to put the Phillies on notice that even if they trade for Oswalt they are going to have to play .800 ball to catch us. I want to be damn good. We’re already good. I want to be even better.

Here’s the thing – I’m against trading prospects for a star to “put us over the top” when we’re only hoping to make the playoffs. However, I am completely behind trading prospects for a star to make us the class of the National League.

Mark Bowman is reporting that the Braves may not be that interested in the Marlins’ Cody Ross. Others are reporting that the Fish are unlikely to move Ross. If you ask me, it sounds like Ross won’t be the next member of the Braves. I would like to see us make a *smart* move and land a center fielder who can give us the production we need from center field to have a potent lineup throughout the batting order.

Let’s go get Marlon Byrd ($5.5M in ’11 and $6.5M in ’12). Or hell, how about we sign Jermaine Dye? His power numbers would be nice and he’d definitely hit for more average than McLouth will. I’ll think on that more and maybe expound on it in another blog post soon.


Tags: , , , ,
Posted in Speculation | 4 Comments »

Jurrjens’ Resurgent In Braves’ Win

Written by Colin on July 1, 2010 – 7:28 am

Jair Jurrjens returned to the Atlanta Braves’ rotation yesterday rested and ready to do battle against the Washington Nationals. In five-plus innings, Jurrjens struck out six and allowed one run (thanks to the relief work of Peter Moylan) and knocked in the go-ahead run as the Braves took the rubber game of the series and won 4-1.

Jurrjens’ admitted to being nervous before the start after two months on the Disabled List because of a hamstring injury, but showed none of it on the mound. His fake bunt and slash RBI single to left field almost took out Ryan Zimmerman on its way to left field.

As our own Kent Covington has pointed out, Jurrjens’ hamstring injury was a blessing in disguise. In Spring Training, Jurrjens battled an inflamed shoulder and elbow. The two months on the bench gave his shoulder and elbow time to recover that simply wasn’t happening before the injury, when his fastballs were routinely in the high 80s. Last night, Jurrjens’ fastball was what Kent calls “resting” in the low 90s – indicating Jurrjens is likely not experiencing the arm issues he was before his DL stint. The other hidden blessing of Jurrjens’ injury was of course the rise of Kris Medlen as the best 5th starter candidate on the team.

If Jurrjens can stay healthy the rest of the season and be as effective as he was last night, his return from the DL will become the equivalent of pulling off a blockbuster trade for another ace. Jurrjens is probably our number two or three pitcher in this rotation, and with his return, our rotation is stronger than it was with Kawakami in Jurrjens’ spot.


Tags: , ,
Posted in Game Analysis, Pitching | 1 Comment »

Atlanta Braves, Tim Hudson Tackle Stephen Strasburg 5-0

Written by Colin on June 29, 2010 – 7:01 am

The hype surrounding the Washington Nationals phenom pitcher Stephen Strasburg is absolutely insane – and most of it is earned. But he’s hittable, and beatable.

The bottom line yesterday was Tim Hudson. Through seven innings of ball, Hudson struck out six, picked off one, walked three, and gave up a total of five hits. His extremely effective sinking two-seamer led to twelve groundouts – and only one fly out. Hudson showed that he’s back in ace form last night – as the nation watched expecting such a performance from the opposing pitcher.

Strasburg was almost as good. Through six innings he held the Braves’ offense scoreless. Nats manager Jim Riggleman almost pinch-hit for Strasburg when his spot in the order came up in the bottom of the sixth (someone came out on deck for Strasburg but was pulled back) and Strasburg came back out to pitch the seventh inning. Right now I’ll bet he wishes he hadn’t. Following a leadoff walk to Chipper (his 46th of the season), the Braves loaded the bases with no outs (thanks to an error) and tattooed WonderBoy for four runs (three earned). They then tacked on another unearned run.

Hustler of the night: Gregor Blanco, who surprised everybody with a bunt down the first base line that the pitcher couldn’t field cleanly for an RBI comes in second to Tim Hudson, who was absolutely ace-like last night.

Slacker of the evening: In the first inning, Melky Cabrera roped a double to left. Chipper then knocked a fly ball to deep left and Melky got caught somewhere between second and third. Had he tagged up, he could have scored when McCann singled to left. Instead, Melky’s slow self got caught trying to score from second to end the inning.

Strasburg Effect: 9601 walkup tickets were sold yesterday and a total of 21,608 tickets were sold since Strasburg’s previous start. The Braves’ franchise thanks Strasburg for coming to Atlanta, selling tickets, and then giving up the loss to improve the Bravos’ home record to 27-8.


Tags: , , , , ,
Posted in Game Analysis | 3 Comments »


BravesBlast.com is not affiliated with or sponsored by the Atlanta Braves organization. Views expressed on this site do not reflect the views of the Atlanta Braves organization.